- Requirements for CI/CD templates
- Template directories
- Template authoring guidelines
- Versioning
- Testing
- Security
- Contribute CI/CD template merge requests
Development guide for GitLab CI/CD templates
This document explains how to develop GitLab CI/CD templates.
Requirements for CI/CD templates
Before submitting a merge request with a new or updated CI/CD template, you must:
- Place the template in the correct directory.
- Follow the CI/CD template authoring guidelines.
- Name the template following the
*.gitlab-ci.yml
format. - Use valid
.gitlab-ci.yml
syntax. Verify it’s valid with the CI/CD lint tool. - Add template metrics.
- Include a changelog if the merge request introduces a user-facing change.
- Follow the template review process.
- (Optional but highly recommended) Test the template in an example GitLab project that reviewers can access. Reviewers might not be able to create the data or configuration that the template requires, so an example project helps the reviewers ensure the template is correct. The example project pipeline should succeed before submitting the merge request for review.
Template directories
All template files are saved in lib/gitlab/ci/templates
. Save general templates
in this directory, but certain template types have a specific directory reserved for
them. The ability to select a template in new file UI
is determined by the directory it is in:
Sub-directory | Selectable in UI | Template type |
---|---|---|
/* (root)
| Yes | General templates. |
/AWS/*
| No | Templates related to Cloud Deployment (AWS). |
/Jobs/*
| No | Templates related to Auto DevOps. |
/Pages/*
| Yes | Sample templates for using Static site generators with GitLab Pages. |
/Security/*
| Yes | Templates related to Security scanners. |
/Terraform/*
| No | Templates related to infrastructure as Code (Terraform). |
/Verify/*
| Yes | Templates related to Testing features. |
/Workflows/*
| No | Sample templates for using the workflow: keyword.
|
Template authoring guidelines
Use the following guidelines to ensure your template submission follows standards:
Template types
Templates have two different types that impact the way the template should be written and used. The style in a template should match one of these two types:
A pipeline template provides an end-to-end CI/CD workflow that matches a project’s
structure, language, and so on. It usually should be used by itself in projects that
don’t have any other .gitlab-ci.yml
files.
When authoring pipeline templates:
- Place any global keywords like
image
orbefore_script
in adefault
section at the top of the template. - Note clearly in the code comments if the
template is designed to be used with the
includes
keyword in an existing.gitlab-ci.yml
file or not.
A job template provides specific jobs that can be added to an existing CI/CD
workflow to accomplish specific tasks. It usually should be used by adding it to
an existing .gitlab-ci.yml
file by using the includes
keyword. You can also copy and paste the contents into an existing .gitlab-ci.yml
file.
Configure job templates so that users can add them to their current pipeline with very few or no modifications. It must be configured to reduce the risk of conflicting with other pipeline configuration.
When authoring job templates:
- Do not use global or
default
keywords. When a root.gitlab-ci.yml
includes a template, global or default keywords might be overridden and cause unexpected behavior. If a job template requires a specific stage, explain in the code comments that users must manually add the stage to the main.gitlab-ci.yml
configuration. - Note clearly in code comments that the template
is designed to be used with the
includes
keyword or copied into an existing configuration. - Consider versioning the template with latest and stable versions
to avoid backward compatibility problems.
Maintenance of this type of template is more complex, because changes to templates
imported with
includes
can break pipelines for all projects using the template.
Additional points to keep in mind when authoring templates:
Template design points | Pipeline templates | Job templates |
---|---|---|
Can use global keywords, including stages .
| Yes | No |
Can define jobs. | Yes | Yes |
Can be selected in the new file UI | Yes | No |
Can include other job templates with include
| Yes | No |
Can include other pipeline templates with include .
| No | No |
Syntax guidelines
To make templates easier to follow, templates should all use clear syntax styles, with a consistent format.
The before_script
, script
, and after_script
keywords of every job are linted
using ShellCheck and should follow the
Shell scripting standards and style guidelines
as much as possible.
ShellCheck assumes that the script is designed to run using Bash.
Templates which use scripts for shells that aren’t compatible with the Bash ShellCheck
rules can be excluded from ShellCheck linting. To exclude a script, add it to the
EXCLUDED_TEMPLATES
list in scripts/lint_templates_bash.rb
.
Do not hardcode the default branch
Use $CI_COMMIT_BRANCH == $CI_DEFAULT_BRANCH
instead of a hardcoded main
branch, and never use master
:
job1:
rules:
if: $CI_COMMIT_BRANCH == $CI_DEFAULT_BRANCH
script:
echo "example job 1"
job2:
only:
variables:
- $CI_COMMIT_BRANCH == $CI_DEFAULT_BRANCH
script:
echo "example job 2"
Use rules
instead of only
or except
Avoid using only
or except
if possible.
Only and except is not being developed any more, and rules
is now the preferred syntax:
job2:
script:
- echo
rules:
- if: $CI_COMMIT_BRANCH
Break up long commands
If a command is very long, or has many command line flags, like -o
or --option
:
- Split these up into a multi-line command to make it easier to see every part of the command.
- Use the long name for the flags, when available.
For example, with a long command with short CLI flags like
docker run --e SOURCE_CODE="$PWD" -v "$PWD":/code -v /var/run/docker.sock:/var/run/docker.sock "$CODE_QUALITY_IMAGE" /code
:
job1:
script:
- docker run
--env SOURCE_CODE="$PWD"
--volume "$PWD":/code
--volume /var/run/docker.sock:/var/run/docker.sock
"$CODE_QUALITY_IMAGE" /code
You can also use the |
and >
YAML operators to split up multi-line commands.
Explain the template with comments
You can access template contents from the new file menu, and this might be the only place users see information about the template. It’s important to clearly document the behavior of the template directly in the template itself.
The following guidelines cover the basic comments expected in all template submissions. Add additional comments as needed if you think the comments can help users or template reviewers.
Explain requirements and expectations
Give the details on how to use the template in #
comments at the top of the file.
This includes:
- Repository/project requirements.
- Expected behavior.
- Any places that must be edited by users before using the template.
- If the template should be used by copy pasting it into a configuration file, or
by using it with the
include
keyword in an existing pipeline. - If any variables must be saved in the project’s CI/CD settings.
# Use this template to publish an application that uses the ABC server.
# You can copy and paste this template into a new `.gitlab-ci.yml` file.
# You should not add this template to an existing `.gitlab-ci.yml` file by using the `include:` keyword.
#
# Requirements:
# - An ABC project with content saved in /content and tests in /test
# - A CI/CD variable named ABC-PASSWORD saved in the project CI/CD settings. The value
# should be the password used to deploy to your ABC server.
# - An ABC server configured to listen on port 12345.
#
# You must change the URL on line 123 to point to your ABC server and port.
#
# For more information, see https://gitlab.com/example/abcserver/README.md
job1:
...
Explain how variables affect template behavior
If the template uses variables, explain them in #
comments where they are first
defined. You can skip the comment when the variable is trivially clear:
variables: # Good to have a comment here, for example:
TEST_CODE_PATH: <path/to/code> # Update this variable with the relative path to your Ruby specs
job1:
variables:
ERROR_MESSAGE: "The $TEST_CODE_PATH path is invalid" # (No need for a comment here, it's already clear)
script:
- echo ${ERROR_MESSAGE}
Use all-caps naming for non-local variables
If you are expecting a variable to be provided via the CI/CD settings, or via the
variables
keyword, that variable must use all-caps naming with underscores (_
)
separating words.
.with_login:
before_script:
# SECRET_TOKEN should be provided via the project settings
- docker login -u my-user -p "$SECRET_TOKEN my-registry
Lower-case naming can optionally be used for variables which are defined locally in
one of the script
keywords:
job1:
script:
- response="$(curl "https://example.com/json")"
- message="$(echo "$response" | jq -r .message)"
- 'echo "Server responded with: $message"'
Backward compatibility
A template might be dynamically included with the include:template:
keyword. If
you make a change to an existing template, you must make sure that it doesn’t break
CI/CD in existing projects.
For example, changing a job name in a template could break pipelines in an existing project.
Let’s say there is a template named Performance.gitlab-ci.yml
with the following content:
performance:
image: registry.gitlab.com/gitlab-org/verify-tools/performance:v0.1.0
script: ./performance-test $TARGET_URL
and users include this template with passing an argument to the performance
job.
This can be done by specifying the CI/CD variable TARGET_URL
in their .gitlab-ci.yml
:
include:
template: Performance.gitlab-ci.yml
performance:
variables:
TARGET_URL: https://awesome-app.com
If the job name performance
in the template is renamed to browser-performance
,
the user’s .gitlab-ci.yml
immediately causes a lint error because there
are no such jobs named performance
in the included template anymore. Therefore,
users have to fix their .gitlab-ci.yml
that could annoy their workflow.
Please read versioning section for introducing breaking change safely.
Versioning
To introduce a breaking change without affecting the existing projects that depend on the current template, use stable and latest versioning.
Stable templates usually only receive breaking changes in major version releases, while latest templates can receive breaking changes in any release. In major release milestones, the latest template is made the new stable template (and the latest template might be deleted).
Adding a latest template is safe, but comes with a maintenance burden:
- GitLab has to choose a DRI to overwrite the stable template with the contents of the latest template at the next major release of GitLab. The DRI is responsible for supporting users who have trouble with the change.
- When we make a new non-breaking change, both the stable and latest templates must be updated to match, as must as possible.
- A latest template could remain for longer than planned because many users could directly depend on it continuing to exist.
Before adding a new latest template, see if the change can be made to the stable template instead, even if it’s a breaking change. If the template is intended for copy-paste usage only, it might be possible to directly change the stable version. Before changing the stable template with a breaking change in a minor milestone, make sure:
- It’s a pipeline template and it has a code comment
explaining that it’s not designed to be used with the
includes
. - The CI/CD template usage metrics doesn’t show any usage. If the metrics
show zero usage for the template, the template is not actively being used with
include
.
Stable version
A stable CI/CD template is a template that only introduces breaking changes in major
release milestones. Name the stable version of a template as <template-name>.gitlab-ci.yml
,
for example Jobs/Deploy.gitlab-ci.yml
.
You can make a new stable template by copying the latest template
available in a major milestone release of GitLab like 13.0
. All breaking changes
must be announced in a blog post before the official release, for example
GitLab.com is moving to 13.0, with narrow breaking changes
You can change a stable template version in a minor GitLab release like 13.1
if:
- The change is not a breaking change.
- The change is ported to the latest template, if one exists.
Latest version
Templates marked as latest
can be updated in any release, even with
breaking changes. Add .latest
to the template name if
it’s considered the latest version, for example Jobs/Deploy.latest.gitlab-ci.yml
.
When you introduce a breaking change, you must test and document the upgrade path. In general, we should not promote the latest template as the best option, as it could surprise users with unexpected problems.
If the latest
template does not exist yet, you can copy the stable template.
How to include an older stable template
Users may want to use an older stable template that is not bundled in the current GitLab package. For example, the stable templates in GitLab 13.0 and GitLab 14.0 could be so different that a user wants to continue using the GitLab 13.0 template even after upgrading to GitLab 14.0.
You can add a note in the template or in documentation explaining how to use include:remote
to include older template versions. If other templates are included with include: template
,
they can be combined with the include: remote
:
# To use the v13 stable template, which is not included in v14, fetch the specific
# template from the remote template repository with the `include:remote:` keyword.
# If you fetch from the GitLab canonical project, use the following URL format:
# https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/raw/<version>/lib/gitlab/ci/templates/<template-name>
include:
- template: Auto-DevOps.gitlab-ci.yml
- remote: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/raw/v13.0.1-ee/lib/gitlab/ci/templates/Jobs/Deploy.gitlab-ci.yml
Further reading
There is an open issue about introducing versioning concepts in GitLab CI/CD templates. You can check that issue to follow the progress.
Testing
Each CI/CD template must be tested to make sure that it’s safe to be published.
Manual QA
It’s always good practice to test the template in a minimal demo project. To do so, please follow the following steps:
- Create a public sample project on https://gitlab.com.
- Add a
.gitlab-ci.yml
to the project with the proposed template. - Run pipelines and make sure that everything runs properly, in all possible cases (merge request pipelines, schedules, and so on).
- Link to the project in the description of the merge request that is adding a new template.
This is useful information for reviewers to make sure the template is safe to be merged.
Make sure the new template can be selected in UI
Templates located under some directories are also selectable in the New file UI. When you add a template into one of those directories, make sure that it correctly appears in the dropdown list:
Write an RSpec test
You should write an RSpec test to make sure that pipeline jobs are generated correctly:
- Add a test file at
spec/lib/gitlab/ci/templates/<template-category>/<template-name>_spec.rb
- Test that pipeline jobs are properly created via
Ci::CreatePipelineService
.
Verify breaking changes
When you introduce a breaking change to a latest
template,
you must:
- Test the upgrade path from the stable template.
- Verify what kind of errors users encounter.
- Document it as a troubleshooting guide.
This information is important for users when a stable template is updated in a major version GitLab release.
Add metrics
Every CI/CD template must also have metrics defined to track their use. The CI/CD template monthly usage report can be found in Sisense (GitLab team members only). Select a template to see the graph for that single template.
To add a metric definition for a new template:
- Install and start the GitLab GDK.
- In the
gitlab
directory in your GDK, check out the branch that contains the new template. -
Add the template inclusion event with this Rake task:
bin/rake gitlab:usage_data:generate_ci_template_events
The task adds a section like the following to
lib/gitlab/usage_data_counters/known_events/ci_templates.yml
:- name: p_ci_templates_my_template_name category: ci_templates redis_slot: ci_templates aggregation: weekly
- Copy the value of
name
from the new YAML section, and add it to the weekly and monthly CI/CD template total count metrics: -
Use the same
name
as above as the last argument in the following command to add new metric definitions:bundle exec rails generate gitlab:usage_metric_definition:redis_hll ci_templates <template_metric_event_name>
The output should look like:
$ bundle exec rails generate gitlab:usage_metric_definition:redis_hll ci_templates p_ci_templates_my_template_name create config/metrics/counts_7d/20220120073740_p_ci_templates_my_template_name_weekly.yml create config/metrics/counts_28d/20220120073746_p_ci_templates_my_template_name_monthly.yml
-
Edit both newly generated files as follows:
-
name:
andperformance_indicator_type:
: Delete (not needed). -
introduced_by_url:
: The URL of the MR adding the template. -
data_source:
: Set toredis_hll
. -
description
: Add a short description of what this metric counts, for example:Count of pipelines using the latest Auto Deploy template
-
product_*
: Set to section, stage, group, and feature category as per the metrics dictionary guide. If you are unsure what to use for these keywords, you can ask for help in the merge request. -
Add the following to the end of each file:
options: events: - p_ci_templates_my_template_name
-
- Commit and push the changes.
For example, these are the metrics configuration files for the 5 Minute Production App template:
- The template inclusion event:
lib/gitlab/usage_data_counters/known_events/ci_templates.yml#L438-L441
- The weekly and monthly metrics definitions:
- The metrics count totals:
Security
A template could contain malicious code. For example, a template that contains the export
shell command in a job
might accidentally expose secret project CI/CD variables in a job log.
If you’re unsure if it’s secure or not, you must ask security experts for cross-validation.
Contribute CI/CD template merge requests
After your CI/CD template MR is created and labeled with ci::templates
, DangerBot
suggests one reviewer and one maintainer that can review your code. When your merge
request is ready for review, please mention
the reviewer and ask them to review your CI/CD template changes. See details in the merge request that added
a DangerBot task for CI/CD template MRs.